| 7:30 a.m.-6:30 p.m. |
Conference Headquarters Hours |
| |
Rio Grande Ballroom, North Wing, Second Floor |
| |
|
| |
DeleteMe Representatives Available |
| |
|
| 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m. |
Benefits Counseling Hours (By Appointment Only) |
| |
Mexico and Texas, North Wing, Second Floor |
| |
|
| 7:30-8:30 a.m. |
BREAKFAST BUFFET |
| |
Woodlands Ballroom, South Wing |
| |
|
| 7:45-8:30 a.m. |
BREAKFAST MEETING FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS |
| |
EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR JUDGES ONLY |
| |
Pecan, South Wing |
| |
|
| Presiding: |
Honorable Randy Crane |
| |
Chief United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
McAllen, Texas |
| |
|
| 8:45-10:00 a.m. |
A CONVERSATION WITH THE CIRCUIT JUSTICE |
| |
Grand Ballroom, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
Honorable Samuel A. Alito, Jr. |
| |
Associate Justice |
| |
Supreme Court of the United States |
| |
Washington, D.C. |
| |
|
| |
Aaron L. Nielson |
| |
Charles I. Francis Professorship in Law, University of Texas School of Law |
| |
Litigation Partner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP |
| |
Austin, Texas |
| |
|
| 10:00-10:30 a.m. |
REFRESHMENT BREAK |
| |
Grand Ballroom Foyer, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| 10:30-11:30 a.m. |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE |
| |
Grand Ballroom, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
“The first duty of society is justice,” wrote Alexander Hamilton. The sacred promise “equal |
| |
justice under law” bestrides the U.S. Supreme Court’s grand entrance, but “justice for only those |
| |
who can afford it is neither justice for all nor justice at all.” Improving access to justice requires |
| |
streamlining court procedures to better serve self-represented litigants, licensing more lawyers, |
| |
allowing more kinds of legal providers, and using technology like AI. Closing the justice gap – a |
| |
chasm, really – between the need for justice and its availability improves public trust in the justice |
| |
system and supports judicial independence. |
| |
|
| Introduction: |
Honorable Don R. Willett |
| |
United States Circuit Judge |
| |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| |
Austin, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Honorable J. Brett Busby |
| |
Justice |
| |
Supreme Court of Texas |
| |
Austin, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Honorable Nathan L. Hecht |
| |
Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Texas (Ret.) |
| |
Partner |
| |
Jackson Walker LLP |
| |
|
| 11:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m. |
CONFERENCE LUNCHEON: LAW, JOURNALISM, AND |
| |
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE COURTS |
| |
Woodlands Ballroom, South Wing |
| |
|
| |
Amy Howe and Sarah Isgur break down how legal reporting shapes public understanding of the |
| |
courts, the Constitution, and the rule of law. This panel will examine the challenge of translating |
| |
complex cases for a broad audience, the tradeoffs of transperency, and why clear, accurate coverage |
| |
matters to public confidence in the legal system. |
| |
|
| Introduction: |
Honorable Christina Ann Bryan |
| |
United States Magistrate Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Houston, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Amy Howe |
| |
Reporter, SCOTUSblog |
| |
|
| |
Sarah M. Isgur |
| |
Editor, SCOTUSblog |
| |
|
| 1:45-3:00 p.m. |
BREAKOUT SESSIONS |
| Option 1 |
Artificial Intelligence and Judging |
| |
Grand Ballroom I, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
What are the best practices for using generative AI in the legal process? And how may they change |
| |
in the years ahead? This panel considers some answers in this important and fast-moving area, |
| |
including: creative ways to use generative AI to improve the analysis of precedent and case records; |
| |
the continuing challenge from hallucinated case and record citations; the reliability of AI-generated |
| |
evidence; issues of privilege and confidentiality that arise from sharing information with AI |
| |
models; and— most importantly—the role of human judgment in a world where AI serves as a |
| |
pervasive assistant to clients, counsel, and the courts. Other topics include the disclosure of AI |
| |
use and how AI tools can best be used without compromising fairness or public confidence. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
David S. Coale |
| |
President, BAFFC |
| |
Partner |
| |
Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann |
| |
Dallas, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Yonathan A. Arbel |
| |
William Alfred Rose Professor of Law and |
| |
Director, AI Legal Studies Initiative |
| |
The University of Alabama School of Law |
| |
Tuscaloosa, Alabama |
| |
|
| |
Kevin T. Frazier |
| |
AI Innovation and Law Fellow |
| |
University of Texas School of Law |
| |
Austin, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Michael Trinh |
| |
Associate General Counsel |
| |
OpenAI |
| |
San Francisco, California |
| |
|
| Option 2 |
Building Effective Federal Re-Entry Programs: Approval Standards, |
| |
Judicial Engagement, and Evidence-Based Tools for Re-Entry Courts |
| |
Houston, North Wing, Second Floor |
| |
|
| |
This session will examine how federal re-entry courts enhance access to justice by providing |
| |
structured, evidence-based pathways to support individuals returning from custody while |
| |
promoting public safety and judicial efficiency. Panelists will discuss how collaborative, problem- |
| |
solving court models use validated risk assessments, individualized case planning, and coordinated |
| |
treatment and supervision to reduce barriers faced by court-involved individuals. |
| |
The panel will also address the standards, requirements, and formal process for courts seeking |
| |
approval to implement a post-conviction special-purpose court program in the Fifth Circuit. |
| |
Panelists will discuss participant eligibility criteria, advancement and graduation standards, |
| |
appropriate use of sanctions and incentives, monitoring and evaluation, and the role of consistent |
| |
judicial interaction in supporting successful outcomes. |
| |
Attendees will gain practical insight into how federal re-entry courts operate, the evidence |
| |
supporting their effectiveness, and the ways in which these programs can expand meaningful |
| |
access to justice while improving long-term reintegration and community safety outcomes for |
| |
program participants. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
Honorable Diana Saldaña |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Laredo, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Honorable Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| |
United States Circuit Judge |
| |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| |
Dallas, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Charles Robinson |
| |
Deputy Chief |
| |
Probation & Pretrial Services Office |
| |
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts |
| |
Washington, D.C. |
| |
|
| |
Honorable Keith Starrett |
| |
Senior United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Mississippi |
| |
Jackson, Mississippi |
| |
|
| Option 3 |
Higher Education in 2026: Emerging Legal and Policy Issues |
| |
Confronting Colleges and Universities |
| |
Grand Ballroom II, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
Recent judicial decisions and legislative changes have changed the legal landscape for colleges and |
| |
universities. This panel of General Counsels from the University of Texas, Texas A&M, and |
| |
Louisiana State University Systems will discuss how Universities and Boards of Regents are |
| |
addressing these changes, along with practical considerations for navigating the future legal |
| |
landscape. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
Honorable David S. Morales |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Corpus Christi, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Nichole Bunker, J.D. |
| |
General Counsel |
| |
Texas A&M University System Board of Regents |
| |
College Station, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Stacey Napier, J.D. |
| |
General Counsel |
| |
University of Texas System Board of Regents |
| |
Austin, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Uma Subramanian, J.D., Ph.D. |
| |
General Counsel |
| |
Louisiana Board of Regents |
| |
Baton Rouge, Louisiana |
| |
|
| Option 4 |
Once and Future Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence |
| |
Spanish/Republic, North Wing, Second Floor |
| |
|
| |
Since 2023, eight of the Federal Rules of Evidence have been amended. This year and next year it |
| |
is expected that four more will undergo revision. This panel will explore the purpose behind each |
| |
amendment and proposed amendment, as well the amendments’ expected and experienced effects |
| |
on practice in the federal trial courts. Staying on top of the rules is essential for both trial lawyers |
| |
and trial judges—this discussion will guide both through the brave new world these amendments |
| |
have wrought. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Galveston, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Katherine Butler Brem |
| |
Clinical Professor, Lawyering Skills and Strategies |
| |
University of Houston Law Center |
| |
Houston, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Phyllis A. Jones |
| |
Partner |
| |
Covington and Burling LLP |
| |
Washington, D.C. |
| |
|
| |
Honorable Reece Rondon |
| |
Shareholder |
| |
Hall Maines Lugrin |
| |
Houston, Texas |
| |
|
| Option 5 |
Post-Conviction Practice in Federal Court: Sentencing Guidelines Amendments and |
| |
Emerging Issues in Probation and Supervised Release |
| |
Grand Ballroom III, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
Recent amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines have significant implications for post- |
| |
conviction practice. Panel discussion will focus on how courts and counsel can address these |
| |
changes, along with practical considerations on supervision, compliance, and modification issues. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
Honorable Charles Eskridge |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Houston, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Douglas A. Berman |
| |
Newton D. Baker-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law |
| |
Executive Director of the Drug Enforcement and Policy Center |
| |
Ohio State University |
| |
Moritz College of Law |
| |
Columbus, Ohio |
| |
|
| |
Honorable David W. Counts III |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Western District of Texas |
| |
Midland, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Maureen Scott Franco |
| |
Federal Public Defender |
| |
Western District of Texas |
| |
San Antonio, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Honorable Carlton W. Reeves |
| |
Chair of the United States Sentencing Commission and |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Mississippi |
| |
Jackson, Mississippi |
| |
|
| 3:00-3:30 p.m. |
REFRESHMENT BREAK |
| |
Grand Ballroom Foyer, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| 3:30-4:45 p.m. |
BREAKOUT SESSIONS |
| Option 1 |
An Honest Discussion About Bankruptcy Exceptionalism |
| |
Spanish/Republic, North Wing, Second Floor |
| |
|
| |
It is often said that bankruptcy courts are “courts of equity.” But what does that really mean? This |
| |
panel will discuss the role of bankruptcy courts and the extent to which bankruptcy courts should use equity
|
| |
to facilitate pragmatic solutions in consumer and corporate bankruptcy cases. Are judges deviating |
| |
from the Bankruptcy Code to achieve equitable results or just trying to fill in gaps in the Code? The |
| |
panel will also explore whether the Bankruptcy Code should be construed applying textualism or |
| |
purposivism, or both, considering recent Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit cases. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
Honorable Christopher M. Lopez |
| |
United States Bankruptcy Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Houston, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Anthony J. Casey |
| |
Donald M. Ephraim Professor of Law and Economics and |
| |
Faculty Director of the Center on Law and Finance |
| |
University of Chicago Law School |
| |
Chicago, Illinois |
| |
|
| |
Jonathan M. Seymour |
| |
Associate Professor of Law |
| |
Duke University School of Law |
| |
Durham, North Carolina |
| |
|
| Option 2 |
Artificial Intelligence and Judging |
| |
Grand Ballroom I, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
What are the best practices for using generative AI in the legal process? And how may they change |
| |
in the years ahead? This panel considers some answers in this important and fast-moving area, |
| |
including: creative ways to use generative AI to improve the analysis of precedent and case records; |
| |
the continuing challenge from hallucinated case and record citations; the reliability of AI-generated |
| |
evidence; issues of privilege and confidentiality that arise from sharing information with AI |
| |
models; and— most importantly—the role of human judgment in a world where AI serves as a |
| |
pervasive assistant to clients, counsel, and the courts. Other topics include the disclosure of AI |
| |
use and how AI tools can best be used without compromising fairness or public confidence. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
David S. Coale |
| |
President, BAFFC |
| |
Partner |
| |
Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann |
| |
Dallas, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Yonathan A. Arbel |
| |
William Alfred Rose Professor of Law and |
| |
Director, AI Legal Studies Initiative |
| |
The University of Alabama School of Law |
| |
Tuscaloosa, Alabama |
| |
|
| |
Kevin T. Frazier |
| |
AI Innovation and Law Fellow |
| |
University of Texas School of Law |
| |
Austin, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Michael Trinh |
| |
Associate General Counsel |
| |
OpenAI |
| |
San Francisco, California |
| |
|
| Option 3 |
Higher Education in 2026: Emerging Legal and Policy Issues |
| |
Confronting Colleges and Universities |
| |
Grand Ballroom II, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
Recent judicial decisions and legislative changes have changed the legal landscape for colleges and |
| |
universities. This panel of General Counsels from the University of Texas, Texas A&M, and |
| |
Louisiana State University Systems will discuss how Universities and Boards of Regents are |
| |
addressing these changes, along with practical considerations for navigating the future legal |
| |
landscape. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
Honorable David S. Morales |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Corpus Christi, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Nichole Bunker, J.D. |
| |
General Counsel |
| |
Texas A&M University System Board of Regents |
| |
College Station, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Stacey Napier, J.D. |
| |
General Counsel |
| |
University of Texas System Board of Regents |
| |
Austin, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Uma Subramanian, J.D., Ph.D. |
| |
General Counsel |
| |
Louisiana Board of Regents |
| |
Baton Rouge, Louisiana |
| |
|
| Option 4 |
Post-Conviction Practice in Federal Court: Sentencing Guidelines Amendments and |
| |
Emerging Issues in Probation and Supervised Release |
| |
Grand Ballroom III, North Wing, First Floor |
| |
|
| |
Recent amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines have significant implications for post- |
| |
conviction practice. Panel discussion will focus on how courts and counsel can address these |
| |
changes, along with practical considerations on supervision, compliance, and modification issues. |
| |
|
| Moderator: |
Honorable Charles Eskridge |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Texas |
| |
Houston, Texas |
| |
|
| Panel: |
Douglas A. Berman |
| |
Newton D. Baker-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law |
| |
Executive Director of the Drug Enforcement and Policy Center |
| |
Ohio State University |
| |
Moritz College of Law |
| |
Columbus, Ohio |
| |
|
| |
Honorable David W. Counts III |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Western District of Texas |
| |
Midland, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Maureen Scott Franco |
| |
Federal Public Defender |
| |
Western District of Texas |
| |
San Antonio, Texas |
| |
|
| |
Honorable Carlton W. Reeves |
| |
Chair of the United States Sentencing Commission and |
| |
United States District Judge |
| |
Southern District of Mississippi |
| |
Jackson, Mississippi |
| |
|
| Option 5 |
Retirement Benefits Overview (For Judges and/or Spouses of Judges Only) |
| |
Houston, North Wing, Second Floor |
| |
|
| Presenter: |
Carol S. Sefren |
| |
Chief, Judges Compensation and Retirement Division |
| |
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts |
| |
Washington, D.C. |
| |
|
| 7:00-10:00 p.m. |
CONFERENCE SOCIAL EVENT: A CELEBRATION OF |
| |
THE UNITED STATES AND THE GREAT STATE OF TEXAS |
| |
Forest Deck and Harrison's Restaurant |
| |
The Woodlands Resort Conference Center |
| |
|
| |
Patriotic attire or western wear (or patriotic Western wear!) is a must for this resort-casual |
| |
themed party onsite at The Woodlands Resort. |